West Volusia's community newspaper of DeLand, Orange City, Deltona, Enterprise, DeBary, Lake Helen, DeLeon Springs, Glenwood, Pierson, Cassadaga, Seville and Barberville in Florida.
Beacononlinenews.com
Newspaper

Read The Latest
Print Edition!
SUBSCRIBE | LOGIN
Calendar of Events
News About You
Find A Directory Listing
Beacon
Magazines
Beacon Magazines
  • News
  • Sports
  • Obituaries
  • Free Classifieds
  • Opinions
  • Entertainment
  • Community
  • Photos and Videos
  • Beacon Info
  • Contact Us
  • Archives
  • Advertise
  • News »
  • Recent News
  • West Volusia Wire
  • Police Logs
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Business Briefs
  • Local Businesses
  • About Our News
  • Send Your News
May 22, 2013

Newsstand Locations

Subscription Specials
West Volusia Beacon
110 W. New York Ave.
DeLand, FL 32720
386-734-4622
 
Send this page to a friend
Publix sues pilot over plane crash into DeLand store
News image

PHOTO COURTESY MARK GRANTHAM
Three minutes after — Publix customer Mark Grantham captured this image of smoke roiling from the Northgate Publix three minutes after an experimental aircraft crashed into the store roof April 2. The store, repaired and renovated, reopened for business June 28. Now, Publix has filed suit against the occupants of the aircraft, asking for unspecified damages.

Lawsuit alleges pilot didn't have needed training

By Pat Andrews
BEACON STAFF WRITER

posted Jul 18, 2012 - 7:48:48pm

Publix has filed suit against the estate of the pilot and owner of the experimental aircraft that crashed into DeLand’s Northgate Publix April 2, alleging “millions of dollars” worth of damages. The suit does not specify the amount of money Publix is seeking.

Publix would not talk about the suit.

“We have a practice and policy of not commenting on pending litigation,” corporate spokesman Dwaine Stevens said.

The suit was filed against the estate of Kim Presbrey, a private pilot who purchased the Seawind 3000 amphibious experimental aircraft in January. Presbrey, 60, died May 26 from burns and other injuries sustained in the April 2 crash. The lawsuit also named Thomas Rhoades, a commercial pilot and a friend of Presbrey’s who was also in the plane. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has not said who was flying the small aircraft when it crashed into the Publix roof.

The suit states the crash caused more than $1 million in damages. The lawsuit also charges Presbrey did not have the training or experience to operate the 2002 kit-built plane, and that Presbrey and Rhoades failed to properly inspect the plane. When Presbrey purchased the plane in January, it had been unused for three years.

The NTSB is expected to complete its investigation of the crash in six months or so.

Presbrey and Rhoades were flying from Aurora, Ill., their home base, to Altamonte Springs for seaplane training April 1, when the plane’s transponder malfunctioned, and they stopped at the DeLand Municipal Airport to get it replaced.

Around 7:15 p.m. April 2, the plane departed from Runway 23 at the DeLand airport, about a mile from the Publix store.

Witnesses said the plane began its takeoff climb, then sputtered, rolled to the left, and crashed, nose-down, into the roof of the Publix, creating a 20-foot-long fireball. Three customers in the store were injured; two of them were released from the hospital that evening. No employees were injured.

The store, newly renovated, reopened June 28.

— pat@beacononlinenews.com

Save this article to Del.icio.us DIGG this article Submit this article to reddit Submit this article to StumbleUpon Share this article on Facebook Submit this article to Fark

Reader Comments

The comments posted below are posted by readers, not by The Beacon staff. These comments express the views and opinions of the authors, and not the administrators, moderators or webmaster. The comments forum is governed by these rules. Please use the report abuse link if you find offensive comments.

Catsrfun | posted Jul 29, 2012 - 7:17:13pm
Bellalaw-please don't use words you don't understand the meaning of.
report abuse
Insurance and Stuff | posted Jul 27, 2012 - 8:31:00pm
@Bella law...that's pretty much what I said without using the term "subrogation".

It will go back and forth for a year or two, until it settles, and they see what they can liquidate.

The pilot's family won't be forced to move or anything like that, but they could lose some assets, if they have much.

The ugly truth is that it's how the law works.

Guess that is what people don't understand.

(Good idea. Look up subrogation)

report abuse
BellaLaw | posted Jul 25, 2012 - 1:40:37am
A lot of you folks need to look up the definition of subrogation.

Or shut up. Florida is a joint and several state and liability is treated as a percentage of responsibility. Publix is not responsible for the actions of the pilot, co-pilot or manufacturer. However, if the defendant parties are to challenge the suit they are most likely going to file cross complaints to lessen their burden. Educate yourselves prior to making comments.

report abuse
JohnnyO | posted Jul 23, 2012 - 8:06:10am
Yay Shirley! Good one, I agree. More than a million was just the loss of product and repairs. The loss of revenue was many times that.
report abuse
shirley | posted Jul 21, 2012 - 8:22:32am
Publix is self-insured meaning they bear the cost of the repairs. As for not seeking to be reimbursed for the expense, that's just rediculous. I'm sorry the man died but it was his responsibility. And, as a lawyer, I'm sure he'd do the same thing. As for you not shopping at Publix, that's fine. You're probably one of those people that blocks the aisle and gets in peoples' way.
report abuse
Support | posted Jul 20, 2012 - 1:29:29pm
Ill go back to Publix time ans time again. Publix is doing NOTHING wrong. You people are frigin crazy. Hey and what about Publix getting sued because a car drove through the front door of one of their stores and hit someone?
report abuse
To Rich | posted Jul 20, 2012 - 12:09:12pm
They didnt land in the frozen food section, they landed between aisle's 4 and 5, about the middle of the aisle.
report abuse
Rich | posted Jul 20, 2012 - 11:18:26am
Publix most certainly has insurance and also has a deductible. If the pilot's estate is required to pay anything it would be the deductible amount....the fellow that is still alive is likely alive because they crashed thru the roof and landed in the frozen food section....severely burned....imagine the suffering the family has already gone thru...hey Publix I will not darken your doorstep if you blatenly sue this poor family...they did not cause the accident, a dead man did and the other fellow is severely hurt and may never again function as a normal human being. Yes you had damages but you Publix have insurance and that is what insurance is for. Very very poor customer relations when you sue folks who are already deeply hurt!!
report abuse
Insurance and Stuff | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 7:53:24pm
First of all I think it is in poor taste to publish this information in the news, at least right now. The families are surely still grieving and dealing with other difficult issues.

Second, it is most likely a liability issue for the insurance companies to hash out. That is why we should carry insurance, and the adjusters either hope you get your own lawyer, so they can get off the hook, or they hope to be able to settlle for equal or less than the full amount of coverage. If the coverage on the policies were "not enough" then they go after the estate, or whatever assets they can get.

Insurance companies hope and try not to let it go to court, because it would cost them more to fight it. (unless the estate and assets are huge) If the "liable" person doesn't get a lawyer then insurance has to provide one. Even tho the adjusters are supposed to evaluate the claim from all angles, they are still looking out for their own best interest not the insured.

The poor families involved can only pray it will settle, and that they not lose everything they own.

report abuse
Get real! | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 3:23:50pm
To the people who say you wouldn't sue - I don't believe you. If you or someoe you loved was injured and incurred medical bills or, heaven formid, killed you would be first in line to get PAID! As far as Publix goes, they have the right to recoop their loses - they were not at fault in this incident in any way. If they don't get reimbursed from the pilot's insurance or his estate who do you think pays for their loss? WE WILL with price increases - then everyone would be complaining about that!!!!
report abuse
DELAND PILOT | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 2:38:45pm
The pilot is resposible for damages. I am sorry he died. His insurance should pay for the damages. Why should Publix pay for the damage? If he crashed into my house, I would be after his estate too. I also was there shopping when the crash occured. There is no reason for me to sue them as I was not injured. If I was injured, I would be going after the pilots estate to pay for the medical bills. This is what insurance is for.
report abuse
linda | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 2:28:30pm
Yes it was an unfortunate accident but Publix unfortunately has to do this since I will guarantee they will have lawsuits filed against them also- it is a liablilty issue more than a monetary issue. If you were in the store and injured when that plane crashed would you sue? yes you would -- and you would go after the big fish (Publix) not the pilot since they have the money. So sorry for the loss of life and my heart goes out to the family of the pilot. If that plane was not mechanically sound and he decided to fly it anyways rather than leave it parked then no matter what he is the blame, just as in if you drove your car with faulty brakes and hit someone or something you are liable. Get over it.
report abuse
nate | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 1:53:36pm
joe, i wouldnt do anything personally to you unless you ran into me on purpose, but if it was an accident where your brakes failed then i sue your insurance thats why you have insurance.
report abuse
nate | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 1:51:08pm
what did publix lose? I am sure insurance took care of all those "improvements" so why would publix sue, let the insurance company sue. This is what our g.d. country has come to. Accidents are just that and why people sue for financial gain over an accident especially one where that person dies is beyond me. sorry publix but you have lost another customer, and I will be sure to pass this along to anyone and everyone i know.
report abuse
linda | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 9:55:24am
I agree with David - Publix has no other choice in this matter I would almost guarantee the insurance company is making this lawsuit happen.

report abuse
Tyson | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 9:35:56am
David,

I was there the day of the crash, and while I was shaken by everything, I'm definetely NOT suing anybody for trauma or any other such thing.

I agree with the 1st couple posters... this family has lots a loved one and suffered through so much.

I'm a huge fan of publix stores, but this whole suit has now left me with a tarnished view.

report abuse
tj | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 9:23:42am
Well I hope Deland airport takes a look at this situation and have a tighter grip on the safety of these planes taking off.
report abuse
John K | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 9:10:23am
Settle down Joe V

I just got back from publix and I never felt better in my hole?! life.

report abuse
Joe Idiot | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 8:05:56am
Joe and Deland what are you two thinking? Sorry someone died but Publix should seek reimbursement. If the plane crashed into your homes you would be doing the same thing. Suppose the brakes on my car fail and I run into you, are you saying you wouldn't come after me for what you have lost? If you say you wouldn't you are full of it.
report abuse
david como | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 7:41:56am
i'm sure that several customers are sueing publix for millions in mental and physical damage,publix is not responsible for, so they are sueing the INSURANCE COMPANIES, not the persons. think about it. your in publix,a plane crashes through the roof,you are traumatized or hurt,you sue publix,where's the fault in publix ? not having a plane crashing net over the roof? seriously,think about it,every one in the store at the time is looking for a payday.
report abuse
Deland Resident | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 7:01:54am
I have to agree this is pretty insensitive. Would seem hard to prove if a preflight inspection would have been able to determine what was apparently engine failure - how do they know he didn't properly inspect the plane? The lawsuit sounds like an insurance company requirement to me and thus is all about money! For the family's sake I hope this gets dismissed in court.
report abuse
JOE V. | posted Jul 19, 2012 - 6:14:31am
I WILL NEVER SHOP AT PUBLIX AGAIN...!!!

THE FAMILY HAS LOST A HUSBAN AND FATHER.

report abuse


Comment on this article

Commenting is closed for this article.

If you would like to contribute a letter to the editor, please click here.


Did you find this story interesting or informative? Subscribe to The West Volusia Beacon to read more stories by Pat Andrews, along with others from our award-winning writers. Subscribe now!

 
Home - News - Sports - Obituaries - Classifieds - Entertainment - Find a... Directory - Opinions - Forums - News About You
Photos - Real Estate - Newcomer's Guide - Beacon Magazines - Advertise - Local Web Sites - About Us - Beacon Archives
Copyright © 2008 The West Volusia Beacon