110 W. New York Ave., DeLand, FL
386-734-4622
MAP COURTESY ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
The Blue Spring basin — The 100 square miles or so that feeds water into Blue Spring is outlined in black on this map. Utilities inside the black line are being told they must find alternatives to underground water, and those alternatives will be very expensive.
BEACON PHOTO/AL EVERSON
Orders to find new water sources — Herky Huffman, left, listens as St. Johns River Water Management District Executive Director Kirby Green, right, tells officials of Volusia County and cities they must begin developing alternative water supplies. The Water Management District's mandate will hit the West Volusia localities especially hard, as they must reduce their reliance on groundwater to ensure strong flows of water into Blue Spring to provide habitat for manatees wintering there. Possible alternative water sources are the St. Johns River and the ocean, and massive capital investment will be needed to build the facilities to refine the surface water for human consumption.
By Al Everson
posted Jun 7, 2009 - 11:02:02am
The political divide that once separated the eastern and western parts of Volusia County may widen again, thanks to the St. Johns River Water Management District.
To preserve the environmental health of Blue Spring, the Water Management District has told West Volusia utilities they must drastically reduce the amount of water they draw from underground, and spend millions of tax dollars to develop alternative water sources.
But East Volusia doesn't have to.
Utility managers expect the alternative water sources will cause the cost of water to rise as much as 350 percent to 700 percent.
In the worst-case scenario, an East Volusia customer would pay $50 for a month's worth of water, while his West Volusia counterpart would pay $400 a month for the same water use.
"West Volusia, we feel, is being asked to bear a disproportionate share of the cost," DeLand Public Services Director Keith Riger said.
While crippling household budgets, that vast difference in cost could kill economic development in West Volusia.
"It would put us at such a disadvantage," DeLand City Commissioner Leigh Matusick said. "If we want to try to bring any kind of business in, and our water rates are 300 percent higher, it's not going to happen."
One of West Volusia’s largest nongovernmental employers, Florida Hospital-DeLand, where 900 people work, pays an average water bill of $15,200 a month.
“That’s about $182,000 a year,” said Administrator Darryl Tol. “If what you say is true — increases of 350 to 700 percent — we’d be looking at a range of $642,000 up to $1.5 million, just for water — and that would be devastating.”
Tol said while the hospital could conserve some, much of its water use goes directly to patient care and safety.
Currently, the four major West Volusia utilities — DeLand, Deltona, Orange City and Volusia County — use about 22 million gallons of water a day from the underground aquifer.
That demand is expected to increase to 37.1 million gallons a day by 2025. By that year, however, the St. Johns River Water Management District wants the West Volusia utilities to draw only 7 million to 10 million gallons a day (mgd) from the aquifer.
The deficit of 27 million to 30 million gallons a day will have to come from somewhere else, possibly the St. Johns River or the Atlantic Ocean. Treating water from either of those sources, and piping it to West Volusia homes and businesses, will be hideously expensive.
The prospect rankles West Volusia government officials, especially since even East Volusia cities that have been allowed to drill wells in West Volusia aren't being asked to suffer the same reductions.
Ormond Beach, for example, has a municipal well field on State Road 11 north of DeLand. Ormond's consumptive-use permit, issued by the Water Management District in 2004, allows the city to increase its underground-water use from 7.39 mgd this year to 8.96 mgd in 2024.
The City of DeLand, on the other hand, which uses about 7 mgd now, is being asked to cut back by 2.6 mgd by as early as 2013, and to cut by as much as 8.2 mgd by 2038.
"The west side goes to the east side for desalinated water. The east side goes to the west side," said Volusia County Council Member Andy Kelly, who lives in DeLand. "There's something wrong with that."
The impetus for the Water Management District's demand, and the reason it affects only West Volusia cities, is Blue Spring.
At the spring, the centerpiece of Blue Spring State Park in Orange City, some 137 cubic feet of water flow up from the aquifer into the spring run every second.
The water from underground is a constant 72 degrees, and creates a warm-water haven in winter for manatees.
Feeding that underground spring is an area of about 100 square miles called the Blue Spring basin or spring shed. Those 100 square miles encompass the cities of West Volusia.
Many years ago, the St. Johns River Water Management District, recognizing the increasing effect of growth on the water supply and the environment, decided the flow at Blue Spring reflected the health of the underground aquifer.
The agency embarked on a study to determine the minimum flows that would keep manatees happy and indicate that the Blue Spring basin remained in good condition.
"If we protect the manatees, we protect all other resources," St. Johns River Water Management District Executive Director Kirby Green recently told a group of government officials.
The decades-long project, hailed by environmentalists and slow-growth advocates, determined minimum flows and levels for Blue Spring. It also is providing the impetus for the Water Management District's demand that West Volusia dramatically alter its water-use habits.
The Water Management District wants to increase the flow at Blue Spring to 157 cubic feet per second by 2024. To accomplish that, West Volusia will have to take a lot less water from underground.
But is it fair?
"Why West Volusia is being held accountable; that question hasn't been answered," DeLand Mayor Bob Apgar said.
"We're taking a disproportionate hit," Volusia County Deputy Manager Mary Anne Connors said.
City Manager Michael Pleus agreed Blue Spring is a treasure that belongs to all of Florida, not just Orange City and its neighbors.
"The protection of that natural resource should not be left solely to the west-side cities," Pleus said.
While water may threaten to widen the political divide between east and west, it is working to unify West Volusia.
Utility officials in DeLand, Deltona, Orange City and Volusia County governments are cooperating to study how best to supply the area's water needs, and to push back at the St. Johns River Water Management District.
The four governments have jointly commissioned a hydrological study that may challenge the Water Management District's projections of effects on Blue Spring.
The study will also help the four governments determine how far conservation measures could go in helping West Volusia reduce its demand on the aquifer.
Currently, officials think even very strict conservation would produce only about a 20-percent savings, or about 7.5 mgd.
It might be enough to allow West Volusia to postpone major expenditures on alternative water, but it's a long way from the 27 mgd savings the Water Management District wants.
Another option being explored is a plant built cooperatively by the four West Volusia utilities to treat water from the St. Johns River.
That would be an alternative to signing on with a similar plant, Yankee Lake, being built by Seminole County on Lake Monroe.
All four West Volusia governments have entertained the possibility of being partners in the Yankee Lake plant, but they now are showing signs of backing off, because of questions about cost and control.
Seminole County is asking prospective partners to make multimillion-dollar payments as early as October this year. But the St. Johns River Water Management District hasn't yet approved Yankee Lake for withdrawals large enough to supply the needs of everyone who might make those payments.
"We could pay $7 million and never get a drop of water," DeLand City Commissioner Charles Paiva observed.
Paiva and the rest of the DeLand City Commission voted unanimously June 1 not to go forward with a Yankee Lake partnership.
DeLand Mayor Apgar agreed with postponing action until the best and lowest-cost alternative can be found, and with possibly using conservation to stretch out the time frame. But Apgar warned that doing nothing is not an option.
"We can't put our heads in the sand and say that we don't have an obligation to develop alternative water supplies," the mayor said.
Herky Huffman, a Deltona Realtor who represents Volusia County on the governing board of the St. Johns River Water Management District, held out hope the obligation can involve both the east and west sides of the county.
Huffman spoke at a recent meeting of officials from Volusia County governments with officials of the Water Management District.
"It's time for this county to come together," Huffman said. "I've lived here 42 years, and it's a war between east and west. We've just got to come together and work on these alternative water supplies."
Reader Comments
The comments posted below are posted by readers, not by The Beacon staff. These comments express the views and opinions of the authors, and not the administrators, moderators or webmaster. The comments forum is governed by these rules. Please use the report abuse link if you find offensive comments.
I don't buy for a minute that this is about 'saving the manatees'. This is all about power and control because there is no fresh water shortage in Florida.
Manatee steaks anybody?
My ire with the "East" began with the move to no driving on the beach and has grown from there. Granted anyone who has lived here for any length of time has seen that our population has grown tremendously in the last 25 years. Growth has created a large drain on resources, land and water --- and as happened in the wild west, I guess the fight will come down to water. The cost will be absolutely prohibitive. I'm considering retirement now but with all the rising costs and the possibility of water costs consuming half of my retirement it's probably a good idea to "cut and run." And yes "Georgia is on my mind" -- pardon the pun. But, who will be able to afford to live here -- better yet, who will want to live here. Maybe the actual reasoning behind this ridiculous movement by the East is to limit growth - or should I say, systematic culling of the population!
How in the can approval be given for a water bottling company to suck untold millions of gallons of water, along with new golf courses, and ferneries etc. Addtionally, how can approval be provided for all of the landscaping for municipal green areas etc., without regard to the impact on residents. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure our that water is essential to life -- whether it be green grass and trees, or you and me!
This proposal is the most ridiculous plan I have ever heard. I can assure you that if the rates go as high as they are predicting, West Voluisa will be a Ghost Town. No business will want to stay here much less move here. Residents will not be able to afford to live here and will move by the droves. Then you get to the people on fixed incomes. How will they survive?
Enough is enough! If you have any concern for this community at all you will get busy and contact your city, county, and state officials to fight this.
If this passes, who will buy your home when you get ready to move?
Had I known about this in advance of buying our home, we would definitely looked elsewhere.
It is clear to me that this current effort by Management District is one more example of environmentalism run amok. If this isn't stopped in its tracks you can kiss home sales and business goodbye in West Volusia.
It is well nigh time for the people of West Volusia to stand up and yell a overpowering and collective NO!!
We didn't move here to pay $100-$200 a month to support some animal. Our pay has dropped, our taxes have risen, our property rates have tanked, and people's debt is going through the roof. What nut in their right mind would push for a change like this, and of this magnitude, at a time when people are struggling to make ends meet?
Humans take priority over animals. Even God has said this. The needs of environmentalists (and in this case manatees) should not trump the needs and will of the people.
If this 350-700% increase comes to fruition, I guarantee you...the people will revolt and leave, and the manatees will die. The only thing that the environmentalists will win on is their foolish "slow-growth" initiative.
These people need to be fought against hard and fast, before TRUE irreparable harm is done.
Comment on this article
Commenting is closed for this article.
If you would like to contribute a letter to the editor, please click here.
Did you find this story interesting or informative? Subscribe to The DeLand-Deltona Beacon to read more stories by Al Everson, along with others from our award-winning writers. Subscribe now!
Photos - Real Estate - Newcomer's Guide - Beacon Magazines - Advertise - Local Web Sites - About Us - Beacon Archives